Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14204 Date Filed: 03/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14204 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:94-cr-00166-RBD-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUTHER LEROY WOODS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 21, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed counse
Summary: Case: 13-14204 Date Filed: 03/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14204 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:94-cr-00166-RBD-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUTHER LEROY WOODS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 21, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel..
More
Case: 13-14204 Date Filed: 03/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14204
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:94-cr-00166-RBD-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LUTHER LEROY WOODS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 21, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Luther Leroy Woods in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
Case: 13-14204 Date Filed: 03/21/2014 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the judgment revoking Woods’s supervised release and his
resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2