Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Luther Leroy Woods, 13-14204 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14204 Visitors: 154
Filed: Mar. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14204 Date Filed: 03/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14204 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:94-cr-00166-RBD-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUTHER LEROY WOODS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 21, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed counse
More
              Case: 13-14204    Date Filed: 03/21/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 13-14204
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 6:94-cr-00166-RBD-KRS-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

LUTHER LEROY WOODS,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (March 21, 2014)

Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Luther Leroy Woods in this

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
              Case: 13-14204     Date Filed: 03/21/2014   Page: 2 of 2


filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the judgment revoking Woods’s supervised release and his

resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer