Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00236-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 27, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed
Summary: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00236-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 27, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed:..
More
Case: 13-14220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14220
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00236-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERRICK WALKER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(March 27, 2014)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-14220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Elsie Mae Miller, appointed counsel for Derrick Walker in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s revocation of
supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2