Filed: Jun. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14314 Date Filed: 06/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14314 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00207-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARL LEVERNE PENDER, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James H. Burke, Jr., appointed
Summary: Case: 13-14314 Date Filed: 06/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14314 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00207-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARL LEVERNE PENDER, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James H. Burke, Jr., appointed c..
More
Case: 13-14314 Date Filed: 06/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14314
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00207-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARL LEVERNE PENDER, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 4, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James H. Burke, Jr., appointed counsel for Carl Leverne Pender, Jr., in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-14314 Date Filed: 06/04/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pender’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2