Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Eddie Lamanquil Smith, 13-14546 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14546 Visitors: 43
Filed: Apr. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14546 Date Filed: 04/04/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14546 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00256-CG-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE LAMANQUIL SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (April 4, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14546 Date Filed: 04/04/
More
           Case: 13-14546   Date Filed: 04/04/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-14546
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00256-CG-C-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

EDDIE LAMANQUIL SMITH,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Alabama
                       ________________________

                              (April 4, 2014)

Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-14546     Date Filed: 04/04/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Kristen G. Rogers, appointed counsel for Eddie Lamanquil Smith in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smith’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer