Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14618 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14618 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00022-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Rob
Summary: Case: 13-14618 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14618 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00022-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Robe..
More
Case: 13-14618 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14618
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00022-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT YOUNG,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(June 5, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Robert Young in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 13-14618 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Young’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2