Filed: May 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14937 Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14937 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00064-JES-DNF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ATILANO SALDANA SALDANA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 23, 2014) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel f
Summary: Case: 13-14937 Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14937 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00064-JES-DNF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ATILANO SALDANA SALDANA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 23, 2014) Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel fo..
More
Case: 13-14937 Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14937
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:13-cr-00064-JES-DNF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ATILANO SALDANA SALDANA,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(May 23, 2014)
Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Atilano Saldana in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
Case: 13-14937 Date Filed: 05/23/2014 Page: 2 of 2
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Saldana=s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2