Filed: Oct. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-14541 Date Filed: 10/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14541 ; 13-15001 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00126-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELVIN JEROME WILCOX, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 16, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-1
Summary: Case: 12-14541 Date Filed: 10/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-14541 ; 13-15001 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00126-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MELVIN JEROME WILCOX, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 16, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-14..
More
Case: 12-14541 Date Filed: 10/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14541 ; 13-15001
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00126-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MELVIN JEROME WILCOX, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 16, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-14541 Date Filed: 10/16/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Judy K. Hunt, counsel for Melvin Jerome Wilcox, Jr., in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wilcox’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2