Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Rodrigo Cantu Morales, 13-15342 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-15342 Visitors: 80
Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15342 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15342 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00028-ACC-TBS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODRIGO CANTU MORALES, a.k.a. Rigo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 23, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: H. Kyle
More
              Case: 13-15342     Date Filed: 06/23/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 13-15342
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00028-ACC-TBS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

RODRIGO CANTU MORALES,
a.k.a. Rigo,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.
                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                  (June 23, 2014)

Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Rodrigo Cantu Morales in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 13-15342     Date Filed: 06/23/2014   Page: 2 of 2


1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Morales’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer