Filed: Jun. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15342 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15342 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00028-ACC-TBS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODRIGO CANTU MORALES, a.k.a. Rigo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 23, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: H. Kyle
Summary: Case: 13-15342 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15342 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00028-ACC-TBS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODRIGO CANTU MORALES, a.k.a. Rigo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 23, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: H. Kyle ..
More
Case: 13-15342 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15342
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00028-ACC-TBS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODRIGO CANTU MORALES,
a.k.a. Rigo,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 23, 2014)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Rodrigo Cantu Morales in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 13-15342 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Morales’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2