Filed: Sep. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15577 Date Filed: 09/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15577 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00046-WTH-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL A. COLLIER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2014) Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15577 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 13-15577 Date Filed: 09/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15577 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00046-WTH-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL A. COLLIER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2014) Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15577 Date Fil..
More
Case: 13-15577 Date Filed: 09/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15577
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00046-WTH-PRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL A. COLLIER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 17, 2014)
Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15577 Date Filed: 09/17/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Christine N. Bird, appointed counsel for Michael Collier in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion is GRANTED, and Collier’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2