Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Manuel Rodriguez, 14-10117 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-10117 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10117 Date Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10117 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60062-WPD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 31, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Timothy Cone, appointed counsel for Manu
More
             Case: 14-10117   Date Filed: 07/31/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                               No. 14-10117
                           Non-Argument Calendar
                         ________________________

                    D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60062-WPD-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

MANUEL RODRIGUEZ,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.
                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                        ________________________
                                   (July 31, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Timothy Cone, appointed counsel for Manuel Rodriguez in this appeal from

his resentencing following our opinion in United States v. Rodriguez, 
732 F.3d 1299
(11th Cir. 2013), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
              Case: 14-10117    Date Filed: 07/31/2014   Page: 2 of 2


appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rodriguez’s sentences are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer