Filed: Sep. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10394 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00303-HES-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WENDELL J. BARTLEY, a.k.a. Poochie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 22, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case:
Summary: Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10394 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00303-HES-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WENDELL J. BARTLEY, a.k.a. Poochie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 22, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 1..
More
Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10394
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00303-HES-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WENDELL J. BARTLEY,
a.k.a. Poochie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 22, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10394 Date Filed: 09/22/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Godfrey, appointed counsel for Wendell J. Bartley in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bartley’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2