Filed: Aug. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10401 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10401 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00170-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA, a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 25, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM and KRAVITCH, Circu
Summary: Case: 14-10401 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10401 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00170-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA, a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 25, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM and KRAVITCH, Circui..
More
Case: 14-10401 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10401
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00170-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JULIO CESAR GONZALEZ-MENDOZA,
a.k.a. Marvin Alonzo Osorto-Hernandez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 25, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10401 Date Filed: 08/25/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Sylvia A. Irvin, appointed counsel for Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Mendoza in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez-Mendoza’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2