Filed: Nov. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10543 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00015-WLS-TQL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEPHANIE ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (November 19, 2014) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10543 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 14-10543 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00015-WLS-TQL-5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEPHANIE ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (November 19, 2014) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10543 Date Fil..
More
Case: 14-10543 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10543
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00015-WLS-TQL-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEPHANIE ROGERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(November 19, 2014)
Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10543 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas V. Duck, III, appointed counsel for Stephanie Rogers in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rogers’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2