Filed: Sep. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10568 Date Filed: 09/18/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10568 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00168-ACC-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WARREN SCOTT KENNELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10568 Date
Summary: Case: 14-10568 Date Filed: 09/18/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10568 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00168-ACC-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WARREN SCOTT KENNELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 18, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10568 Date F..
More
Case: 14-10568 Date Filed: 09/18/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10568
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00168-ACC-TBS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WARREN SCOTT KENNELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 18, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10568 Date Filed: 09/18/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Tracy N. DaCruz, appointed counsel for Warren Kennell in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion is GRANTED, and Kennell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2