Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10895 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10895 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00142-MMH-PDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGER G JOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 21, 2014) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed
Summary: Case: 14-10895 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10895 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00142-MMH-PDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGER G JOLLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 21, 2014) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Craig L. Crawford, appointed ..
More
Case: 14-10895 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10895
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00142-MMH-PDB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROGER G JOLLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 21, 2014)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Roger Jolley in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 14-10895 Date Filed: 10/21/2014 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jolley’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2