Filed: Nov. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10962 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00191-CB-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM DOUGLAS MCRAND, III, a.k.a. McGram, a.k.a. June Bug, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (November 14, 2014) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Jud
Summary: Case: 14-10962 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10962 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00191-CB-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM DOUGLAS MCRAND, III, a.k.a. McGram, a.k.a. June Bug, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (November 14, 2014) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judg..
More
Case: 14-10962 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10962
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00191-CB-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM DOUGLAS MCRAND, III,
a.k.a. McGram,
a.k.a. June Bug,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(November 14, 2014)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10962 Date Filed: 11/14/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Eleanor J. Jones, appointed counsel for William McRand, III in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of McRand
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and McRand’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2