Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Khambrel Holcmbe, 14-11060 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11060 Visitors: 123
Filed: Dec. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11060 Date Filed: 12/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11060 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60260-WPD-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KHAMBREL HOLCOMBE, a.k.a. Brel, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (December 29, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11060
More
           Case: 14-11060    Date Filed: 12/29/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                      [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-11060
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60260-WPD-3



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

KHAMBREL HOLCOMBE,
a.k.a. Brel,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (December 29, 2014)

Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11060     Date Filed: 12/29/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Nathan Clark, counsel for Khambrel Holcombe, has moved to withdraw

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because our

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Holcombe’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer