Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11092 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11092 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:00-cr-00187-VMC-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH PACE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 14, 2014) Before JORDAN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Susan Yazgi, counsel for Kenneth Pace in
Summary: Case: 14-11092 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11092 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:00-cr-00187-VMC-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KENNETH PACE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 14, 2014) Before JORDAN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Susan Yazgi, counsel for Kenneth Pace in t..
More
Case: 14-11092 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11092
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:00-cr-00187-VMC-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KENNETH PACE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 14, 2014)
Before JORDAN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Susan Yazgi, counsel for Kenneth Pace in this appeal, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
Case: 14-11092 Date Filed: 10/14/2014 Page: 2 of 2
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Pace’s revocation of supervised release and resulting sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2