Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert W. Stickney, ap
Summary: Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11510 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert W. Stickney, app..
More
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11510
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-28
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORESTE ROLANDO CHAVEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(November 5, 2014)
Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Stickney, appointed counsel for Oreste Rolando Chavez, has filed
a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
Case: 14-11510 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the defendant’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2