Filed: Oct. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11650 Date Filed: 10/08/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11650 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00061-MCR-1 JASON ANDREW VITULANO, Defendant-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 8, 2014) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald M. Sheehan, appointe
Summary: Case: 14-11650 Date Filed: 10/08/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11650 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00061-MCR-1 JASON ANDREW VITULANO, Defendant-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 8, 2014) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Donald M. Sheehan, appointed..
More
Case: 14-11650 Date Filed: 10/08/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11650
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00061-MCR-1
JASON ANDREW VITULANO,
Defendant-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 8, 2014)
Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donald M. Sheehan, appointed counsel for Jason Vitulano in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 14-11650 Date Filed: 10/08/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Vitulano’s motion for appointment of new
counsel is DENIED, and Vitulano’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2