Filed: Oct. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12444 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12444 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 5:14-cv-00212-TJC; 6:13-bk-10595-KSJ In Re: VINCENT N. FARMER, Debtor. _ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus VINCENT N. FARMER, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 20, 2014) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit J
Summary: Case: 14-12444 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12444 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 5:14-cv-00212-TJC; 6:13-bk-10595-KSJ In Re: VINCENT N. FARMER, Debtor. _ BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus VINCENT N. FARMER, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 20, 2014) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Ju..
More
Case: 14-12444 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 1 of 3
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12444
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 5:14-cv-00212-TJC; 6:13-bk-10595-KSJ
In Re: VINCENT N. FARMER,
Debtor.
________________________________
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
VINCENT N. FARMER,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 20, 2014)
Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Case: 14-12444 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Bank of America, N.A. (BOA) appeals the district court’s final order and
judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting debtor Vincent N.
Farmer’s motion to avoid BOA’s second mortgage lien in his Chapter 7
bankruptcy. Farmer has two mortgage liens on his house: the first has an
outstanding balance that exceeds the current value of the home, the second being
junior to the first. The second lien, held by BOA and at issue in this case, is
considered to be wholly “underwater” because the value of Farmer’s house does
not fully offset the first lien and will thus not reach the second lien. Farmer sought
to have BOA’s second lien voided under § 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code, see 11
U.S.C. § 506(d), because this Court’s precedent holds that § 506(d) authorizes a
Chapter 7 debtor to “strip off,” i.e. remove in its entirety, a wholly underwater
junior lien. See McNeal v. GMAC Mortg., LLC,
735 F.3d 1263, 1264–66 (11th
Cir. 2012) (per curiam); Folendore v. SBA,
862 F.2d 1537, 1539 (11th Cir. 1989).
The bankruptcy court granted Farmer’s motion to strip off the junior lien, with
BOA reserving its right to seek appellate review of the decision. The district court
granted BOA’s motion for summary affirmance, noting BOA’s preserved right to
appeal, and BOA filed its appeal to this Court.1
1
Farmer filed no answer brief in this appeal.
2
Case: 14-12444 Date Filed: 10/20/2014 Page: 3 of 3
BOA argues that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dewsnup v. Timm,
502
U.S. 410 (1992), rejected our circuit’s interpretation of § 506(d) set forth in
Folendore, and that we should re-evaluate its holding. Yet, in McNeal we held that
Dewsnup has no application to Folendore because Dewsnup only prohibited the
“strip down” of partially secured mortgages.
McNeal, 735 F.3d at 1265–66.
Unlike in Dewsnup, the junior liens at issue in Folendore and McNeal—and also in
this case—were wholly unsecured and subject instead to a “strip off.” Thus,
Dewsnup did not abrogate Folendore and we remain bound to follow our prior
precedent. See United States v. Vega-Castillo,
540 F.3d 1235, 1236 (11th Cir.
2008).
AFFIRMED.
3