Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Earl Nettles, 13-14153 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14153 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14153 Date Filed: 06/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14153 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-14042-JEM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EARL NETTLES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 23, 2015) Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14153 Date
More
           Case: 13-14153   Date Filed: 06/23/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-14153
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 2:06-cr-14042-JEM-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

ROBERT EARL NETTLES,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (June 23, 2015)

Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-14153     Date Filed: 06/23/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Robert Earl Nettles in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Nettles’s convictions and total

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer