Filed: May 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14339 Date Filed: 05/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14339 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00123-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWIN VIDAL TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 4, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed
Summary: Case: 13-14339 Date Filed: 05/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14339 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00123-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWIN VIDAL TORRES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 4, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed ..
More
Case: 13-14339 Date Filed: 05/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14339
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:13-cr-00123-RBD-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWIN VIDAL TORRES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 4, 2015)
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Edwin Vidal Torres in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-14339 Date Filed: 05/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396 (1967). In a pro se response to counsel’s motion to withdraw, Torres
requests that counsel’s motion be denied or that new counsel be appointed to brief
his appeal. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Torres’s request for appointment of new
counsel to brief his appeal is DENIED, and Torres’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2