Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14555 Date Filed: 02/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20381-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TYRONE HART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (February 13, 2015) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: David Tucker, appointed counsel
Summary: Case: 13-14555 Date Filed: 02/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20381-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TYRONE HART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (February 13, 2015) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: David Tucker, appointed counsel ..
More
Case: 13-14555 Date Filed: 02/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14555
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20381-DMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TYRONE HART,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(February 13, 2015)
Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
David Tucker, appointed counsel for Tyrone Hart, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
Case: 13-14555 Date Filed: 02/13/2015 Page: 2 of 2
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Hart’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2