Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tyrone Hart, 13-14555 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14555 Visitors: 57
Filed: Feb. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14555 Date Filed: 02/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20381-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TYRONE HART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (February 13, 2015) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: David Tucker, appointed counsel
More
              Case: 13-14555     Date Filed: 02/13/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]


                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                           ________________________

                                 No. 13-14555
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20381-DMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                             versus

TYRONE HART,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.
                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                (February 13, 2015)


Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

      David Tucker, appointed counsel for Tyrone Hart, has moved to withdraw

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
              Case: 13-14555     Date Filed: 02/13/2015    Page: 2 of 2


California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Hart’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer