Filed: Jun. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15792 Date Filed: 06/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15792 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00264-AT-JFK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS PINEDA, a.k.a. Chivo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (June 17, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15792 Date
Summary: Case: 13-15792 Date Filed: 06/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15792 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00264-AT-JFK-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LUIS PINEDA, a.k.a. Chivo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (June 17, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15792 Date ..
More
Case: 13-15792 Date Filed: 06/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15792
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00264-AT-JFK-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LUIS PINEDA,
a.k.a. Chivo,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(June 17, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15792 Date Filed: 06/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2
S. Lester Tate, III, appointed counsel for Jose Luis Pineda in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pineda’s convictions and total
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2