Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Dario Feria, 14-10672 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-10672 Visitors: 96
Filed: Jan. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10672 Date Filed: 01/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10672 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00300-JEC-ECS-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARIO FERIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (January 27, 2015) Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointe
More
              Case: 14-10672    Date Filed: 01/27/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 14-10672
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00300-JEC-ECS-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

DARIO FERIA,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                                (January 27, 2015)

Before HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Dario Feria, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 14-10672    Date Filed: 01/27/2015   Page: 2 of 2


counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Feria’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer