Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 2, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 2, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11403
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 2, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
James A. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Julius Isoron England in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and England’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2