Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Julius Isoron England, 14-11403 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11403 Visitors: 112
Filed: Apr. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed: 04/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11403 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 2, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11403 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 14-11403   Date Filed: 04/02/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-11403
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00296-TJC-PDB-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JULIUS ISORON ENGLAND,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 2, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11403     Date Filed: 04/02/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      James A. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Julius Isoron England in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and England’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer