Filed: Mar. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11450 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11450 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00043-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMOND LEVAR JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 30, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11450 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 14-11450 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11450 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00043-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEMOND LEVAR JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 30, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11450 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 14-11450 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11450
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00043-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DEMOND LEVAR JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(March 30, 2015)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11450 Date Filed: 03/30/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Brett Meltzer, appointed counsel for Desmond Johnson in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2