Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Javaris Montez Bloodser, 14-12175 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12175 Visitors: 147
Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12175 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12175 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00047-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVARIS MONTEZ BLOODSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (July 27, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12175 Date Fi
More
           Case: 14-12175   Date Filed: 07/27/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-12175
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00047-CAR-CHW-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JAVARIS MONTEZ BLOODSER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                             (July 27, 2015)

Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12175     Date Filed: 07/27/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Donald L. Johstono, appointed counsel for Javaris Montez Bloodser in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bloodser’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer