Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12175 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12175 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00047-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVARIS MONTEZ BLOODSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (July 27, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12175 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 14-12175 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12175 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00047-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAVARIS MONTEZ BLOODSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (July 27, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12175 Date Fil..
More
Case: 14-12175 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12175
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00047-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAVARIS MONTEZ BLOODSER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(July 27, 2015)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12175 Date Filed: 07/27/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Donald L. Johstono, appointed counsel for Javaris Montez Bloodser in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bloodser’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2