Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Naba Raheem Lewis, 14-12241 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12241 Visitors: 75
Filed: Apr. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12241 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12241 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00591-RAL-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NABA RAHEEM LEWIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 9, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12241 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 14-12241   Date Filed: 04/09/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-12241
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00591-RAL-AEP-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

NABA RAHEEM LEWIS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 9, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12241     Date Filed: 04/09/2015    Page: 2 of 2


      Meghan Collins, counsel for Naba Raheem Lewis, has moved to withdraw

from further representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because our review reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to

withdraw is GRANTED, and Lewis’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer