Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Christopher N. Gandolfo, 14-12419 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12419 Visitors: 91
Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12419 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12419 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80124-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER N. GANDOLFO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (January 14, 2015) Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12419 Dat
More
            Case: 14-12419   Date Filed: 01/14/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-12419
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80124-DTKH-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                   versus


CHRISTOPHER N. GANDOLFO,
                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (January 14, 2015)

Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12419     Date Filed: 01/14/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Randee J. Golder, appointed counsel for Christopher Gandolfo in this

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gandolfo’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer