Filed: Apr. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12484 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12484 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 22, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Katherine P.
Summary: Case: 14-12484 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12484 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 22, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Katherine P. ..
More
Case: 14-12484 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12484
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(April 22, 2015)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Katherine P. Luker, appointed counsel for Christopher Herrera in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
Case: 14-12484 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 2 of 2
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Herrera=s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2