Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Christopher Gregory Herrera, 14-12484 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12484 Visitors: 74
Filed: Apr. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12484 Date Filed: 04/22/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12484 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 22, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Katherine P.
More
              Case: 14-12484    Date Filed: 04/22/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 14-12484
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00423-RDP-SGC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

CHRISTOPHER GREGORY HERRERA,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Alabama
                         _________________________

                                  (April 22, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Katherine P. Luker, appointed counsel for Christopher Herrera in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant

and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
              Case: 14-12484    Date Filed: 04/22/2015   Page: 2 of 2


counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Herrera=s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer