Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12511 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12511 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARVIN BOSTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12511 Date File
Summary: Case: 14-12511 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12511 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARVIN BOSTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12511 Date Filed..
More
Case: 14-12511 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12511
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARVIN BOSTON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 17, 2015)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12511 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Judy K. Hunt, appointed counsel for Marvin Boston Jr. in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boston’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2