Filed: Feb. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12833 Date Filed: 02/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12833 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00051-WLS-TQL-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHNNY WESLEY, a.k.a. Mott, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (February 9, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-1283
Summary: Case: 14-12833 Date Filed: 02/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12833 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00051-WLS-TQL-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHNNY WESLEY, a.k.a. Mott, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (February 9, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12833..
More
Case: 14-12833 Date Filed: 02/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12833
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00051-WLS-TQL-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHNNY WESLEY,
a.k.a. Mott,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(February 9, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12833 Date Filed: 02/09/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Oliver R. Register, appointed counsel for Johnny Wesley in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief
prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wesley’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2