Filed: May 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13012 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60164-JIC-7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR BRUNO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 21, 2015) Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/2
Summary: Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13012 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60164-JIC-7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HECTOR BRUNO, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 21, 2015) Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/21..
More
Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13012
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60164-JIC-7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
HECTOR BRUNO, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(May 21, 2015)
Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-13012 Date Filed: 05/21/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel in this direct criminal appeal for
Hector Bruno, Jr., has moved to withdraw from further representation of Bruno and
has filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bruno’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2