Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Shawn Ephisian Taylor, 14-13471 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13471 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13471 Date Filed: 04/09/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13471 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00035-WS-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN EPHISIAN TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (April 9, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Ratliff, appoi
More
                Case: 14-13471     Date Filed: 04/09/2015     Page: 1 of 2


                                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]


                  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                           FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                             ________________________

                                   No. 14-13471
                               Non-Argument Calendar
                             ________________________

                       D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00035-WS-N-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHAWN EPHISIAN TAYLOR,

                                                Defendant-Appellant.
                             ________________________

                      Appeal from the United States District Court
                         for the Southern District of Alabama
                             ________________________

                                     (April 9, 2015)


Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

         Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Shawn Taylor, in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
              Case: 14-13471     Date Filed: 04/09/2015   Page: 2 of 2


filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer