Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14007 Date Filed: 06/11/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14007 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00013-WTH-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DELVON LAMAR WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 11, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14007 Date Fi
Summary: Case: 14-14007 Date Filed: 06/11/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14007 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00013-WTH-PRL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DELVON LAMAR WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 11, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14007 Date Fil..
More
Case: 14-14007 Date Filed: 06/11/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14007
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00013-WTH-PRL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DELVON LAMAR WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 11, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-14007 Date Filed: 06/11/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Delvon Lamar Williams in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2