Filed: Apr. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14279 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00002-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARNOLD CLAYTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 8, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles L. Truncale, counsel for Ar
Summary: Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14279 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00002-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARNOLD CLAYTON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 8, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles L. Truncale, counsel for Arn..
More
Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14279
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00002-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARNOLD CLAYTON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 8, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Truncale, counsel for Arnold Clayton, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
Case: 14-14279 Date Filed: 04/08/2015 Page: 2 of 2
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Clayton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2