Filed: Jul. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14587 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14587 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00054-MMH-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEONARD BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 15, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles L. Truncale, appointed
Summary: Case: 14-14587 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14587 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00054-MMH-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEONARD BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 15, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles L. Truncale, appointed ..
More
Case: 14-14587 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14587
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00054-MMH-JRK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEONARD BURGESS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 15, 2015)
Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles L. Truncale, appointed counsel for Leonard Burgess in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
Case: 14-14587 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Burgess’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2