Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15200 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15200 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00175-TJC-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY ANDREWS, a.k.a. Little Larry, a.k.a. "L", Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 2, 2015) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: Case: 14-15200 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15200 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00175-TJC-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LARRY ANDREWS, a.k.a. Little Larry, a.k.a. "L", Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 2, 2015) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
Case: 14-15200 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15200
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00175-TJC-JBT-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LARRY ANDREWS,
a.k.a. Little Larry,
a.k.a. "L",
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 2, 2015)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15200 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Valerie Linnen, appointed counsel for Larry Andrews in this direct criminal
appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Andrews’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2