Filed: Aug. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15482 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15482 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20206-BB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELLUS ROUNDTREE, a.k.a. Four, a.k.a. Fatboy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 21, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Cas
Summary: Case: 14-15482 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15482 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20206-BB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELLUS ROUNDTREE, a.k.a. Four, a.k.a. Fatboy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (August 21, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case..
More
Case: 14-15482 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15482
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20206-BB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCELLUS ROUNDTREE,
a.k.a. Four,
a.k.a. Fatboy,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(August 21, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15482 Date Filed: 08/21/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Sheryl J. Lowenthal, appointed counsel for Marcellus Roundtree in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Roundtree’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2