Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15655 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15655 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80240-KAM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON ANDREW VITULANO, a.k.a. J, a.k.a. Jay, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 24, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: Case: 14-15655 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15655 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80240-KAM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON ANDREW VITULANO, a.k.a. J, a.k.a. Jay, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 24, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
Case: 14-15655 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15655
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80240-KAM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON ANDREW VITULANO,
a.k.a. J,
a.k.a. Jay,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(June 24, 2015)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Adler, appointed counsel for Jason Andrew Vitulano in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
Case: 14-15655 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 Page: 2 of
2
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vitulano=s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2