Filed: Sep. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10382 Date Filed: 09/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10382 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:90-cr-00084-HES-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENT LAVETT ALLEN, Pork Chop, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 30, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 1
Summary: Case: 15-10382 Date Filed: 09/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10382 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:90-cr-00084-HES-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VINCENT LAVETT ALLEN, Pork Chop, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 30, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15..
More
Case: 15-10382 Date Filed: 09/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10382
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:90-cr-00084-HES-JRK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VINCENT LAVETT ALLEN,
Pork Chop,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 30, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10382 Date Filed: 09/30/2015 Page: 2 of 2
John Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Vincent Lavett Allen, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
revocation of Allen’s supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.
2