Filed: Jul. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10668 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10668 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00020-MW-CAS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES DERRICK BRASWELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 16, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10668 Date F
Summary: Case: 15-10668 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10668 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00020-MW-CAS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES DERRICK BRASWELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 16, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10668 Date Fi..
More
Case: 15-10668 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10668
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00020-MW-CAS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES DERRICK BRASWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 16, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10668 Date Filed: 07/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for James Derrick Braswell in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Braswell’s conviction and sentence is
AFFIRMED.
2