Filed: Oct. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10878 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERI MICHELLE MARKS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 28, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10
Summary: Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10878 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JERI MICHELLE MARKS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 28, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10/..
More
Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10878
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00054-CG-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JERI MICHELLE MARKS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(October 28, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10878 Date Filed: 10/28/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Raymond L. Bell, Jr., counsel for Jeri Michelle Marks in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). We are instructed to decide independently, upon plenary
examination of the case, whether the appeal is wholly frivolous.
Id. at 744. Our
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Marks’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2