Filed: Sep. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11172 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00249-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANAISSA BETH GERWALD, a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald, a.k.a. Ann E. Meraw, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (Septemb
Summary: Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11172 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00249-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANAISSA BETH GERWALD, a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald, a.k.a. Ann E. Meraw, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin, a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (Septembe..
More
Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11172
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00249-WTM-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANAISSA BETH GERWALD,
a.k.a. Anaizza Gerwald,
a.k.a. Ann E. Meraw,
a.k.a. Ana Isabel Marraquin,
a.k.a. Ana Isabel Garcia,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(September 15, 2015)
Case: 15-11172 Date Filed: 09/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Before TJOFLAT, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
George R. Asinc, appointed counsel for Anaissa Gerwald in this criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the revocation of Gerwald’s supervised release and her
revocation sentence are AFFIRMED. Gerwald’s motion for appointment of
substitute counsel is DENIED.
2