Filed: Oct. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-11699 Date Filed: 10/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11699 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00040-HES-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES FRANKLIN HUDSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 5, 2015) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Roland Falcon,
Summary: Case: 15-11699 Date Filed: 10/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11699 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00040-HES-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES FRANKLIN HUDSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 5, 2015) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Roland Falcon, ..
More
Case: 15-11699 Date Filed: 10/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11699
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00040-HES-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES FRANKLIN HUDSON, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 5, 2015)
Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Charles Hudson, Jr., has filed a motion
Case: 15-11699 Date Filed: 10/05/2015 Page: 2 of 2
to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Hudson’s convictions and total sentence are AFFIRMED.
2