Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Willie J. Douglas, Jr., 15-12294 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 15-12294 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-12294 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00212-GKS-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 1, 2015) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12294 Date
More
           Case: 15-12294   Date Filed: 12/01/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 15-12294
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00212-GKS-DAB-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR.,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 1, 2015)

Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 15-12294    Date Filed: 12/01/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Conrad Kahn, appointed counsel for Willie James Douglas, has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire

record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Douglas’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

motion is AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer