Filed: Dec. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-12294 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00212-GKS-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 1, 2015) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12294 Date
Summary: Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-12294 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00212-GKS-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 1, 2015) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12294 Date ..
More
Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12294
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:07-cr-00212-GKS-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIE JAMES DOUGLAS, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 1, 2015)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12294 Date Filed: 12/01/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Conrad Kahn, appointed counsel for Willie James Douglas, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of Douglas’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion is AFFIRMED.
2