Filed: Feb. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10932 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORDELL JONES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 10, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/20
Summary: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10932 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORDELL JONES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 10, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/201..
More
Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10932
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CORDELL JONES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 10, 2016)
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Angelo Ferlita, appointed counsel for Cordell Jones in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L.
Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Moreover, Jones has filed a motion for appointment of new
counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones=s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED. Jones’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
2