Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cordell Jones, 15-10932 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 15-10932 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10932 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORDELL JONES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 10, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10932 Date Filed: 02/10/20
More
            Case: 15-10932   Date Filed: 02/10/2016   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 15-10932
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00306-CEH-MAP-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

CORDELL JONES,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (February 10, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 15-10932     Date Filed: 02/10/2016   Page: 2 of 2


      Angelo Ferlita, appointed counsel for Cordell Jones in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 18 L.

Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Moreover, Jones has filed a motion for appointment of new

counsel. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones=s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED. Jones’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer