Filed: Aug. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-13271 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 29, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-13
Summary: Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-13271 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MOHAMMED BAH, a.k.a. Little, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (August 29, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-132..
More
Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-13271
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00098-RWS-RGV-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MOHAMMED BAH,
a.k.a. Little,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(August 29, 2016)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-13271 Date Filed: 08/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED
AS MOOT.
2